Wed | Jun 19, 2019

The global energy balance is changing

Published:Sunday | October 5, 2014 | 12:00 AM
A helicopter takes off from the helipad of the Development Driller III, which is drilling the relief well at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana Tuesday, May 11, 2010. - AP

David Jessop, Contributor

No one should be in any doubt: the world's energy balance is changing rapidly with profound political and economic consequences for the way every country and region will in future relate to one another.

On October 1, the Financial Times reported that the United States is near to overtaking Saudi Arabia to become the world's largest producer of liquid petroleum. It noted that the two countries production levels of oil and related products such as propane were, at the rate of about 11.5 million barrels a day, now almost equal.

Other reports note that for the first time, US North Slope, Alaska crude is being exported to Korea, that pressure is mounting on the US administration to allow energy exports out of ports in the Gulf of Mexico and that Nigeria - previously one of the top-five suppliers of oil to the United States - has all but ceased to be among its suppliers of crude.

In a further reflection of the changing nature of global supply and demand, at the start of October the price for Brent Crude, the benchmark for trading oil, fell to US$92.04 - the lowest figure recorded for more than two years.


What all of this demonstrates is that the US has been moving faster towards self-sufficiency and having an energy surplus than previous forecasts have suggested.

US production of crude oil is now likely to continue to increase sharply up to 2019 with US natural gas production set to outpace domestic consumption by 2020 or earlier, so that by 2016, the US will become a net exporter of natural gas.

This is occurring because technological advance and a lessening of environmental controls have enabled a significant increase in production from shale and other formations as a result of hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling. It is taking place just as US energy consumption is in decline as a result of the introduction of fuel economy requirements for vehicles; liquefied natural gas (LNG) is gradually offsetting diesel fuel consumption; and renewable energy for power generation is growing at a much faster rate than the use of fossil fuels.

Until quite recently, the consensus, based on conventional methods for the recovery of oil and gas, was that the US would remain a middle level producer requiring imports far into the future. However, this is now demonstrably no longer so.

For the Caribbean, which remains heavily dependent on oil supplied from Venezuela under the concessional PetroCaribe arrangement, the long-term implications of what is happening are considerable.

By 2035 the US will likely be not only energy self-sufficient, but also a net exporter of oil and LNG. Lower energy prices may well mean that it brings back onshore many manufacturing operations and jobs as new forms of high-tech based industrialisation occur using lower-cost domestic energy.

Apart from the obvious implication that an energy self-sufficient US may cause the countries of the Caribbean Basin to reorient the way they think about the world, it also has more direct implications.

For a region in which high energy costs, and expensive power-generation and transmission costs continue to damage the competitiveness of everything from tourism to manufacturing, a moment may come, for whatever reason, and if the US is willing, that it seeks to balance its present arrangements with Venezuela.

Already, commercial interests are well advanced in locating a major LNG receiving terminal near San Pedro de Marcoris on the southern coast of the Dominican Republic for completion in 2016, with the objective that it supplies gas for domestic power-generation needs in the Dominican Republic.

It is a development that could lead in time to recognition that

the country could also become a gas redistribution centre for the region, in view of the Republic's strategic location; its free trade agreements with the US, Central America and with others; and its ports and deep water anchorages.

In addition, US Vice President Joe Biden announced in June a little-noticed energy security initiative for the region which offers "any individual country committed to achieving an energy sector transformation ... a comprehensive package of strategic planning and technical assistance".

One outcome has been that on September 3, the US signed with Grenada a pilot energy-cooperation agreement to identify the necessary improvements required to encourage investment in renewable and other energy sources.

The geopolitical consequences for the world of changing sources of energy supply are only just emerging.

Europe may gradually free itself from Russia's gas supply hegemony; China will become the biggest consumer of Middle East oil, and may have no option other than to become more directly involved in that region; Saudi Arabia will need to diversify its influence and relationships, choosing judiciously how much oil to pump and when, if it is to retain global influence; the US may in time change its long-term posture on the Middle East; and eventual energy security in the Americas may see it emerge as a zone of economic stability able to look at new economic opportunity with partners in both the East and the West.

For these and many other reasons, the energy revolution now under way suggests that in less than 20 years, the political and economic relationships within the Americas and even Caribbean interrelationships may be very different to today.

David Jessop director of the Caribbean Council. Email