UK gov't agrees under pressure to divulge Brexit plan details
Britain's House of Commons voted on Wednesday to back Prime Minister Theresa May's March 31 deadline to start the U.K's. formal exit from the European Union, after the government agreed to publish details of its negotiating plan.
The Conservative government has been reluctant to reveal much about its strategy or goals, saying that would weaken its hand in negotiations with the EU.
Fearing defeat through an opposition motion calling for ministers to disclose more details before the talks start, the government agreed to publish a plan. However, it did not make any promises on how specific the plan would be.
The government also proposed a concession of its own by amending the motion to state Parliament's support for triggering EU exit talks by March 31.
The motion passed by a vote of 448 to 75 after the main opposition Labour Party said it would accept the amendment.
Labour Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer said his party was not seeking to block Brexit - backed by a majority of voters in a June referendum - but to bring "clarity, scrutiny and accountability" to the process.
"The terms upon which we leave the EU will define us and our country for many years," he said.
Brexit Secretary David Davis promised the government would set out "strategic plans," but said it would not reveal anything that could "jeopardise our negotiating position."
The vote marked the first major success in efforts by pro-EU lawmakers - including those in Conservative ranks - to influence the course of Brexit. Some 48 percent of electors voted to stay in the bloc, and many want to avoid a "hard Brexit" in which the country leaves the EU single market in goods and services.
Conservative lawmaker Anna Soubry said "remain" voters felt ignored, and implored the government to "include that 48 percent" in plans for leaving the EU.
Both the government and the opposition say the motion is does not affect a case at the Supreme Court over whether the government has the authority to start negotiations without legislation in Parliament. May's government is appealing a lower court's ruling that lawmakers must get a say before Article 50 can be invoked.
Eleven Supreme Court judges are hearing the case, which has major constitutional implications for the balance of power between Britain's legislature branch and the executive.