Fri | Oct 20, 2017

Gwynne Dyer | What's behind Brazil coup?

Published:Tuesday | May 17, 2016 | 12:00 AM

 

Q: What's the difference between the coup that overthrew the elected government in Thailand in 2014 and the coup that has removed the elected government in Brazil?

A: The coup-makers in Thailand wore uniforms.

The Brazilian Senate recently voted 55-22 to impeach President Dilma Rousseff. She has been suspended for 180 days while the same body tries her on the charge of understating the size of the budget deficit before the last election.

If two-thirds of the senators find her guilty, she will be permanently removed from office. Since they have just voted to impeach her by a bigger majority than that, we may take it for granted that she is a goner.

Two justifications have been offered for this unseating of an elected president, but both of them are pretty flimsy. The first is the legal justification, which is that Rousseff's Government tweaked the accounts a bit to make Brazil's financial situation look less bad before the last election in 2014.

She did, but which elected government anywhere does not try to put the best face on its figures? Anyway, nobody believes that this is the real reason for her removal from power.

The broader political justification is that she has made a mess of the economy. The economy certainly is in a terrible mess. In each of the last two years it has shrunk by four per cent, one-tenth of the population is unemployed and inflation is exploding, but every big commodity-exporting country has been in the same mess since the global financial crash of 2008. The demand for their exports simply collapsed.

Rousseff didn't create this crisis, but inevitably, she gets the blame for it. That, rather than some obscure legal issue, is why nearly two-thirds of Brazilians think she should be impeached. But while she might have done better at managing the crisis, in a democracy, political questions like this are normally settled by elections, not by impeachment.

The 55 senators who voted to impeach her all know that, but they couldn't resist the temptation to take her down. Which brings us to the real motive behind all this, and the worrisome comparison with Thailand, where the generals took over in 2014.

 

NON-VIOLENT ACTION

 

The Thais, like the Brazilians, evicted their military rulers from power in the 1980s by non-violent political action. As is bound to happen in a democracy, both countries then developed powerful political movements that demanded a redistribution of wealth in favour of the impoverished half of the population. In both countries, the prosperous urban middle classes mobilised against this threat.

The hopes of the Thai poor were focused on Thaksin Shinawatra (prime minister 2001-2006) and later, after the military forced him into exile, his sister, Yingluck Shinawatra (prime minister 2011-2014).

In Brazil, the left-wing leader was Luiz Inacio 'Lula' da Silva of the Workers' Party (president 2002-2010), and subsequently his close ally, Dilma Rousseff (president 2010-2016).

In Thailand, the struggle between the rural and urban poor (the 'yellow shirts') and the defenders of the economic status quo (the 'red shirts') descended into the streets early, and had got quite bloody by the time the generals seized power in 2014. They intervened in favour of the 'red shirts', of course, but they seem determined to hold on to power themselves for the forseeable future.

Brazil's politics has been less violent and the military has not intervened (yet), but it is just as much a class struggle, made more intractable by the fact that in Brazil social class is colour-coded. The white half of the population is mostly prosperous, the 'pardo' (mixed-race) and black half mostly poor.

Nobody will admit that this crisis is about ending government subsidies for the poor, but the crowds demonstrating against Rousseff's government have been almost entirely white. So is the Cabinet sworn in by the new interim president, Michel Temer. But Temer is going to have a very hard time running the country.

Outraged Workers' Party supporters are already being radicalised by the 'coup' that has driven Dilma Rousseff from power and the struggle is moving into the streets. Mass demonstrations and barricades are now a common sight, and the protesters will find it hard to resist disrupting the Olympic Games that start in Rio de Janeiro in early August.

Which may provide the excuse for the Brazilian right to welcome the military back into power.

- Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com.