Tue | Sep 25, 2018

No designer babies, but gene editing to avoid disease? Maybe

Published:Wednesday | February 15, 2017 | 12:00 AM


Do not expect designer babies any time soon - but a major new ethics report leaves open the possibility of one day altering human heredity to fight genetic diseases, with stringent oversight, using new tools that precisely edit genes inside living cells.

What is called genome editing is already transforming biological research and is being used to develop treatments for patients struggling with a range of diseases.

The science is nowhere near ready for a huge next step that raises ethical questions - altering sperm, eggs or embryos so that babies don't inherit a disease that runs in the family, says a report on Tuesday from the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine.

But if scientists learn how to safely pass alterations of the genetic code to future generations, the panel said 'germline' editing could be attempted under strict criteria, including that it targets a serious disease with no reasonable alternative and is conducted under rigorous oversight.




"Caution is absolutely needed, but being cautious does not mean prohibition," said bioethicist R. Alta Charo of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"This committee is not saying we will or should do germline - heritable - editing. What we are saying is that we can identify a set of strict conditions under which it would be permissible to do it," Charo added. "But we are far, far away from being ready to try."

Genome editing should not go beyond healing the sick and enhance traits such as physical strength, what's commonly called "designer babies," the panel stressed.

But the public should get involved in these debates now, to say what might one day be acceptable.

The long-awaited report offers advice the prestigious academies cannot set policy. But it is considered a step towards creating international norms for responsible development of this powerful technology. The US National Academies and its counterparts in Britain and China have been holding international meetings with the hope of doing just that.