Wednesday | March 13, 2002
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Free Email
Guestbook
Personals
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Political posturings

IT IS indeed the silly season and as our political leaders prepare for general election this year, we hope that the issue of good governance is placed at the heart of their campaigns.

In our experience this is the season when political parties go on the hustings and in the past, some of our leaders have made some unfortunate utterances. This newspaper recently reported a speech by Prime Minister P.J. Patterson in which he warned the opposition Jamaica Labour Party against launching its month-long anti-corruption campaign.

Mr. Patterson reportedly said that previous JLP governments had a lot to answer to on the matter of the disappearance of public funds. He made specific reference to money allocated for road work in Manchester, which he said, went missing before the 1972 elections.

There are two issues here. If Mr. Patterson was aware of public funds that went missing, did his government not feel it had a duty to identify the culprit or culprits and bring them to justice? Did they even try to ascertain what really happened? Of course it's never too late to put the State apparatus in motion to apprehend those responsible for gobbling up what seems like an obscene amount of taxpayers' money. The road in Resource, Manchester, was constructed at a cost of $10.5 million.

It is full time that governments recognise that they hold fiduciary powers in trust for the people. That recognition carries with it, among other things, a duty of punctilious accountability.

Second, is Mr. Patterson suggesting that it is a defence to the opposition's charge of corruption against his government that a previous government was also corrupt? In other words "what's good for the goose is also good for the gander?"

There was a time, long ago, when an uneducated electorate would have applauded Mr. Patterson for his "clever politicking." Those days are gone. Mr. Patterson's recent utterances offer little comfort. There is a deep feeling of revulsion against the politics of self-aggrandisement and even deeper anger at partisan agendas. And our politicians wonder why there are so many uncommitted voters.

Back to Commentary


















In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions