Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Motorist challenges legality of 'designated bus lanes'
published: Wednesday | April 16, 2003

By John Myers, Jnr., Staff Reporter

THE TRAFFIC Court judge who is trying a motorist who is challenging the legality of designated bus lanes in the Corporate Area of Kingston and St. Andrew is to rule on April 24 whether he is guilty of committing an offence by driving in such a lane.

The judge reserved his decision yesterday at the end of proceedings in the Corporate Area Traffic Court, Camp Road, Kingston.

Willard Costley of Waterford, Portmore, south east St. Catherine, pleaded not guilty to driving illegally in a designated bus lane. Mr. Costley was charged with the offence on December 11, 2002, after he drove in a designated bus lane at the intersection of Ken Hill Drive and Washington Boulevard, St. Andrew.

NULLIFY THE CHARGE

He admitted that he was guilty of driving in the lane, but he is contending that the charge was illegal as there was no vehicle defined in Jamaican law as "a bus" and, therefore, a "bus lane" cannot be designated by the Minister of Transport.

Mr. Costley argued in court yesterday that the

Transport Minister erred in law when he made such a designation under Section 105 of the Road Traffic Act. He said such a lane should have been designated under Section 59 of the Road Traffic Act, which gives the Minister the power to make the necessary amendments and regulations which would allow for bus lanes to be established under law. He emphasised that the Minister must first properly define the term "bus".

He asked the court to declare the charge against him null and void, as "Section 16 of his constitutional rights was violated" when he was charged with the offence. Also, he is asking the court to rule that "bus lanes" and all relating signs be declared null and void.

Mr. Costley indicated that if on April 24 he was found guilty, he intended to take the matter to the Court of Appeal.

More Lead Stories
































©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner