Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Other News
Stabroek News

Editorial - Where Marley belongs
published: Friday | January 14, 2005

BOB MARLEY'S death in 1981 was an international news event and reports that his widow, Rita, planned to exhume his body from Nine Miles in St. Ann and re-inter the remains of Jamaica's most famous citizen at Shashemane in Ethiopia were no less so.

About 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday a story by an Associated Press writer was posted on the Yahoo homepage, tagged '57 minutes ago'. It would get as far as CNN before the Marley Foundation reported that Rita Marley denied having said so.

It is not yet a pattern, but it was the second report of an about-face that Mrs. Marley was making about her husband in a year. She had earlier backtracked on allegations, made in her autobiography, that he raped her.

If, indeed, Mrs. Marley had decided to exhume Bob Marley's body and rebury him in Ethiopia for his 60th birthday, February 6, 2005, the debates and furore would have been unending. And, after all, notably in the famous Neville Willoughby interview, Bob Marley had said that he was intent on going to Africa to live, saying that "I haffi live near my father".

However, it was Bob Marley who refused to have a piece of his body cut off and, in so doing, sealed his fate, despite subsequent attempts at cancer treatment. It is highly unlikely, then, that a man who did not want to lose a toe would want his body, all at once or piece by piece, to be moved thousands of miles. It would certainly be a great loss for Jamaica.

It is interesting, though, that this story, denied or not, comes at a time when there was a campaign of sorts to make Marley a National Hero. We use 'was' because that idea seems to have fizzled, certainly in public prominence. It would make for intriguing discussion if there was a campaign to have a person made a National Hero even if his remains have been removed to another country.

Alas, that battle will never be.

Marley's remains belong in Jamaica. Certainly, a widow has first say over what happens to her husband's remains, but Robert Marley's achievements were far from a football striker's solo run. This man, who also loved football, was part of a team that included persons as disparate as Lee Scratch Perry and the person who named a hymn book Redemption Song that is in a church near Nine Miles, which Bob Marley would have been exposed to as a child.

To relocate Bob Marley's body would be to take away an irreplaceable piece of Jamaica, as well as insult the many who have contributed to his success and worldwide fame.

More Commentary | | Print this Page















© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner