Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Let's Talk Life
Mind &Spirit
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Review of the Da Vinci Code
published: Saturday | July 8, 2006

By Dominique Rose

Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code postulates a theory that is not new, but certainly is more topical as the world changes, women's issues become less marginalized and our formerly male dominated sphere becomes more balanced between the sexes. The story, built on historical truths is largely fictional, and while the main theme is that of finding the Holy Grail, it at the same time challenges the value system of the thinking Christian and other religions by posing four main questions: biblical validity, the divine feminine, the humanness versus the divinity of Jesus and what exactly is the Holy Grail.

Biblical validity is questioned in a way that looks at the truth and symbolism to suggest the dogma of inspiration is contrived, in as much as the book as we know it, is a result of the Council of Nicea. Past lessons of biblical facts, symbolism and truths are replayed in the viewer's mind. It is easy to bypass the discussion on the divine feminine, as the movie does not detail the concept as well as the novel does. However, Christians are challenged as there seems to be an exclusion (a deliberate manoeuvre of the Council of Nicea according The Da Vinci Code) of an active holy feminine figure, much less a divine feminine as seen in other ancient near east cults in the form of Aschar or Isis. Dan Brown in The Da Vinci Code makes a case of conspiracy in that the essential divine feminine figure is excluded by the domination of a macho-patriarchal church intent on subjugating all femininity and replacing it with a male mystery in Christian worship of the Trinity.

Further, it questions the Christian fundamental belief that Jesus is divine and is the Son of God; and in so doing it postulates the possibility of the humanness of Jesus - the son of Mary versus a divine Messiah in Jesus - the Son of God. The divinity or humanness of Jesus is also central to the plot of The Da Vinci Code. A human Jesus dispels prior knowledge, comfort levels and status quo as we know it. A human Jesus with a love interest is the carpenter, the son of Mary having no bearing to a God-sent Messiah. Refer Mark 6:3 "is this not the carpenter, the son of Mary". Even then, doubts existed that were proved to persons before belief was concretised as in Mark 15:39 "truly this was the Son of God".

Moreover, the human Jesus is purported to have married Mary Magdalene, who was herself from the same royal bloodline as Jesus. According to The Da Vinci Code, it is Mary Magdalene who is the Holy Grail or the holy vessel bearing the bloodline of Jesus as the mother of his child - Sarah, and not the chalice of the Last Supper.

The movie challenges the strength of the individual's and community's faith convictions, but should inspire a quest for learning to re-assure and strengthen both individual and community in an age of increasing knowledge and openness.

Dominique Rose is a student at St. Michael's Theological College who is pursuing the Certificate in Biblical Studies.

More Mind &Spirit



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner