Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
What's Cooking
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Drug claim challenged
published: Thursday | March 29, 2007

The Editor, Sir:

I appreciate your attention to the important issue of drug adverse effects for statins in the article 'Rattray wrong on cholesterol drugs' by Dr. Anthony Vendryes, published in the March 23, 2007 issue of the Jamaica Gleaner Online.

However, I was distressed to see that I was mischaracterised as saying that 98 per cent of patients on Lipitor get muscle problems, and that a third of patients on Mevacor do so. This statement is patently untrue, and I never did nor ever would say it. In one analysis focused on 100 subjects who experienced muscle problems that they attributed to statins, 98 per cent met literature criteria for probable drug causality. (A later analysis showed a somewhat lower fraction, though still very high).

That is the only 98 per cent I can imagine having alluded to. The sample was already selected for having muscle problems on statins - it can make no characterisation about the fraction of people on statins who report such problems. Additionally, it is true that rates of adverse effects up to a third have been reported in some observational studies of statins (particularly at higher dose), though other studies report lower rates.

Adverse effects of statins absolutely need to be considered together with their benefits in making treatment decisions. However, such serious mischaracterisation of statements by those of us interested in adding balance to the discussion of statins damages the credibility of those of us who are interested in ensuring consideration of the full risk benefit balance; which can only hurt the cause of adding balance to the discussion.

I am, etc.,
BEATRICE GOLOMB, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Diego bgolomb@ucsd.edu

UCSD Department of Medicine

9500 Gilman Drive #0995

La Jolla, CA

Via Go-Jamaica

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





Home - Jamaica Gleaner