THE EDITOR, Sir:

In the debate over "conflict of interest", we've missed the boat as usual. It should not be about the persons appointed to the positions but a wider principle.

In the matter of John Lynch and the Jamaica Tourist Board chairmanship, as happened in the Wehby issue, we're arguing about an individual's record while overlooking, yet again, that his high-profile employment (with the Sandals chain) does invite questions about where his loyalty could ultimately lie.

Things have not been helped by Mr. Butch Stewart's appalling "lengthy statement," to quote his newspaper, in which he chose to launch a mud-slinging attack on the previous administration with which it is well-known, he enjoyed a close and valued connection, before coming to the conclusion, it seems, that he no longer needs them.

As if that were not enough, Mr. Stewart went on to boast of how many employees he has in top positions on important boards - the Jamaica Hotel and Tourist Association, the Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica and the Jamaica Tourist Board. If we're to believe what was also included in his "lengthy statement," another of his top men is in line to take over the Jamaica Chamber of Commerce.

Where else but in Jamaica would that not raise questions about conflict of interest?

How can so much power reside in one organisation - the Sandals empire - without comment from the rest of the private sector? A final question - will Mr. Lynch be resigning from the St. Lucia Tourist Board or will he serve that and the JTB at the same time? In which country's best interest it will be then?

I am, etc.,

PUZZED

Kingston 5