Xstrata board recommends Glencore merger

Published: Wednesday | October 3, 2012 Comments 0
President of the administrative board of Glencore, Simon Murray, leaves a shareholder meeting of the company in Zug, Switzerland, Friday, September 7, 2012. - AP
President of the administrative board of Glencore, Simon Murray, leaves a shareholder meeting of the company in Zug, Switzerland, Friday, September 7, 2012. - AP

The board of Anglo-Swiss mining company Xstrata PLC said Monday it is recommending shareholders accept merger terms with Swiss commodities trader Glencore PLC a deal that would create an industry behemoth with revenues of around US$175 billion.

Xstrata said in a statement it was supporting the offer of 3.05 Glencore shares for each Xstrata share.

The deal values Xstrata at 31.9 billion (US$51.5 billion) on the shares' closing price last Friday. Glencore has a market capitalisation of 23.5 billion, according to data provider FactSet.

Xstrata is the world's biggest exporter of thermal coal and also produces copper, nickel and zinc.

If the deal is approved by 75 per cent of Xstrata shareholders, the merged company would be one of the world's largest natural resources firms.

Glencore, one of the world's biggest traders in raw materials such as coal, cotton, and corn, went public with a US$10 billion IPO last year.

Its attempt to get hold of Xstrata has developed into a long-running saga. Previous offers were resisted by Xstrata shareholders, including Qatari sovereign wealth fund Qatar Holding, which holds 12 per cent of Xstrata.

Glencore improved its original offer of 2.8 shares last month, leaving issues of management structure and executive remuneration the main stumbling blocks to a merger.

The deal announced Monday would see Xstrata chief executive Mick Davis become CEO of the new company for six months, then leave the company to be succeeded by Glencore CEO Ivan Glasenberg.

Xstrata said it had agreed to give shareholders a separate vote on bonuses for senior executives, a key sticking point to a deal.

highly compelling

While Xstrata recommended that shareholders also vote in favour of the bonus scheme, the merger's approval will not depend on it.

Mike van Dulken, head of research at Accendo Markets, said the new deal was designed to remove the issue of retention payments as a potential roadblock and "hurry up termination of the seven-month saga after major shareholders recently warmed to an improved share offer".

"The deal is not done - not just yet," he said though Monday's three per cent rise in Xstrata's share price suggests investors and traders "see an endgame being closer".

Davis said the strategic rationale behind a merger was "highly compelling".

"A merger will fuse the respective strengths of the two companies into a unique, vertically integrated natural resources group," he said.

Glencore Chairman Simon Murray said the merged company "will have the scale to play a key role in meeting the growing global demand for commodities whilst helping resource holding countries create value from their natural endowments".

formed in 2002

Xstrata, based in Zug, Switzerland, was formed in 2002 when it bought Glencore's coal assets. The company mines copper in the Americas, zinc in Spain and ferrochrome and vanadium in Australia and South Africa.

Glencore extracts, ships and refines raw materials from coal, to copper to corn. It is based in the Swiss town of Baar but has its main stock listing in London.

Glencore was founded in 1974 by Marc Rich, the fugitive trader who was controversially pardoned in 2001 by then United States President Bill Clinton just hours before he left office.

Rich sold the company to its employees in 1994, and the firm has been at pains to distance itself from its founder and any whiff of improper activity, though environmental groups have since targeted the company for its mining interests.

AP

Share |

The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. Please keep comments short and precise. A maximum of 8 sentences should be the target. Longer responses/comments should be sent to "Letters of the Editor" using the feedback form provided.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Top Jobs

View all Jobs

Videos