Missing link of AGD draft report

Published: Monday | December 17, 2012 Comments 0


I am somewhat puzzled by the recent swirl of events related to the auditor general's report and the reactions to it by some of the government bodies referred to in the report.

My understanding is that when the Auditor General's Department (AGD) examines the accounts and workings of a government body in question, it then sends the draft report to that body and invites comments. It is then that the body can give explanations to show that the draft report is lacking, or did not consider certain issues, or is otherwise misconceived.

If that opportunity is not taken, the draft report goes as is to Parliament, and then into the public domain.

The question then arises: Was the opportunity given or taken to enable the government body to comment? If not, why not? If not, why does the body then seek to castigate the AGD or otherwise rubbish the report?

I would welcome some guidance on what is going on in this area.



Share |

The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. Please keep comments short and precise. A maximum of 8 sentences should be the target. Longer responses/comments should be sent to "Letters of the Editor" using the feedback form provided.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Top Jobs

View all Jobs