Cameras were fully functional, Barbados airport head tells court

Published: Tuesday | March 19, 2013 Comments 0
The Jamaican legal team with Shanique Myrie (third left) leaving the Supreme Court No.1 in Bridgetowm, Barbados, yesterday. - photo by Nigel Browne
The Jamaican legal team with Shanique Myrie (third left) leaving the Supreme Court No.1 in Bridgetowm, Barbados, yesterday. - photo by Nigel Browne

Barry Alleyne, Contributor

The man in charge of the daily running of the Grantley Adams International Airport has testified that all cameras at the nation's lone airport were fully functional on March 14, 2011, when Shanique Myrie first arrived in Barbados.

Joseph Johnson, who has worked at Grantley Adams for more than three decades and is now the facility's chief operations officer, told the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) yesterday that the cameras had not been newly installed and had been in place and working from around 2005 when the airport's new terminal began operations.

He made the revelation in the Supreme Court No. 1 under cross examination on the first leg of the CCJ's hearing of Shanique Myrie's discrimination case against the Government of Barbados.

Myrie is claiming she was discriminated against because of her nationality and was also subjected to a body-cavity search by Immigration Department officials when she arrived in Barbados.

Always working

In response to a question by Myrie's attorney, Nancy Anderson, Johnson said there were times faulty cameras had to be replaced but the ones in place had always worked. He also revealed that there were no surveillance cameras in the Immigration Department's security area, nor were there any in the bathrooms at the airport.

"They were fully functional in March 2011," Johnson told the court when asked by Anderson. "The terminal opened in 2005, and the cameras were installed shortly after."

Also giving testimony yesterday was Acting Comptroller of Customs Frank Holder. He told Jamaica's High Commissioner to Barbados Sharon Saunders that the cameras were being tested. Also under cross by Anderson, Holder denied he had told Saunders there were times when the cameras didn't work. "I didn't tell her they only worked sometimes. I told her I wasn't sure if they were functioning. I also told her they were being tested," Holder said.

The case resumes at 9 a.m. today.

Share |

The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. Please keep comments short and precise. A maximum of 8 sentences should be the target. Longer responses/comments should be sent to "Letters of the Editor" using the feedback form provided.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Top Jobs

View all Jobs

Videos