Windies make shaky start - Ross double century, early wickets put Kiwis in control

Published: Thursday | December 5, 2013 Comments 0
New Zealand's BJ Watling (left) appeals unsuccessfully for the wicket of West Indies' Marlon Samuels on the second day of their international Test cricket match in Dunedin, New Zealand, yesterday. - AP
New Zealand's BJ Watling (left) appeals unsuccessfully for the wicket of West Indies' Marlon Samuels on the second day of their international Test cricket match in Dunedin, New Zealand, yesterday. - AP
Taylor
Taylor

 DUNEDIN, New Zealand (CMC):

West Indies made a shaky start in their first innings against New Zealand after Ross Taylor scored a maiden double century to put his side in control of the first Test on the second day at University Oval in Dunedin here yesterday.

The West Indies, reduced to 24-2 before recovering to reach 67 without further loss by the close, face a herculean task to avoid defeat after New Zealand racked up an imposing 609-9 declared.

The West Indies faced 24 overs before stumps and were quickly in trouble when Trent Boult angled a ball across Kirk Edwards, who edged it straight to Peter Fulton for a regulation slip catch.

Edwards was out for a duck and fellow opener Kieran Powell followed in similar fashion soon after, when caught by wicketkeeper Watling for seven.

Darren Bravo, not out 37, and Marlon Samuels on 14, both survived confident appeals as they held the innings together until the close of play.

Taylor has become only the 13th New Zealander to reach 200 in a Test innings. He shared in a 195-run partnership with replacement skipper Brendon McCullum - a record fourth-wicket stand for New Zealand against the West Indies.

Taylor was at the crease for more than eight hours, faced 319 balls and hit 23 boundaries without risking a lofted shot.

After New Zealand resumed the day at 367-3, the West Indies made early inroads with the removal of McCullum for 113 and Corey Anderson without scoring.

BJ Watling (41) restored order with Taylor in an 84-run stand for the sixth wicket before the West Indies engineered a second mini breakthrough.

Tino Best claimed the scalp of Watling and Narsingh Deonarine removed Tim Southee for two to have New Zealand at 472-7, before Ish Sodhi (35) and Neil Wagner (37) helped Taylor to get New Zealand past the 600-run milestone.

New Zealand declared at their fourth-highest Test score following the dismissal of Wagner after the tailender and Taylor had belted 34 runs in five overs after the tea break.

The aggressive Best, with his short-pitched deliveries, was the most successful of the West Indies bowlers, returning figures of three for 148, while Sammy and Deonarine finished with two wickets apiece.

SCOREBOARD

New Zealand first innings

(overnight 367-3)

Peter Fulton c Edwards b Sammy 61

Hamish Rutherford c

Deonarine b Shillingford 62Aaron Redmond c Samuels b Best 20Ross Taylor not out 217Brendon McCullum b Sammy 113Corey Anderson c Ramdin b Best 0BJ Watling c Edwards b Best 41Tim Southee c Bravo b Deonarine 2Ish Sodhi c&b Deonarine 35Neil Wagner run out 37

Extras: lb-10, nb-1, b-10 21

Total: (for 9 wickets dec. 153.1 overs) 609

Fall of wickets: 1-95, 2-117, 3-185, 4-380, 5-385, 6-469, 7-472, 8-548, 9-609.

Did not bat: Trent Boult.

Bowling: Best 34.1-5-148-3, Gabriel 27.5-4-148-0, Sammy 3.1-4-79-2 (nb-1), Shillingford 46-7-138-1, Deonarine 22-0-76-2.

West Indies first innings

Kirk Edwards c Fulton b Boult 0Kieran Powell c Watling b Southee 7Darren Bravo not out 37Marlon Samuels not out 14

Extras: lb-8, nb-1 9

Total: (for two wickets, 24 overs) 67

Fall of wickets: 1-4 2-24

Still to bat: Shiv Chanderpaul, Narsingh Deonarine, Denesh Ramdin, Darren Sammy, Shane Shillingford, Tino Best, Shannon Gabriel.

Bowling: Boult 8-5-7-1, Southee 7-1-15-1, Wagner 6-2-27-0 (nb-1), Sodhi 3-0-10-0.

Umpires: Nigel Llong, Paul Reiffel.

TV Umpire: Ian Gould.

Match Referee: Roshan Mahanama.

Share |

The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. Please keep comments short and precise. A maximum of 8 sentences should be the target. Longer responses/comments should be sent to "Letters of the Editor" using the feedback form provided.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Top Jobs

View all Jobs

Videos