Sun | May 22, 2022

Bernard judicial review in PS saga starts today

Published:Tuesday | January 18, 2022 | 12:11 AM
Dean-Roy Bernard’s judicial review fight of his reassignment begins today.
Dean-Roy Bernard’s judicial review fight of his reassignment begins today.

Dean-Roy Bernard, the in-limbo permanent secretary (PS) of the education ministry, is to return to the Supreme Court today when a judicial review of the Public Service Commission’s decision to reassign him from his post in 2019 is expected to start.

Bernard was transferred from the ministry in February 2019 to the Ministry of Finance and the Public Service as director general and Dr Grace McLean, who was the chief education officer in the ministry was promoted to PS.

However, Bernard successfully contested the move to reassign his position to another person and McLean was relegated to acting PS after the court ruled that the post should not be reassigned until the matter has been settled and granted him leave for a judicial review.

The judicial review hearing was set to begin on Monday but was adjourned as the matter was set before a single judge instead of a three-judge panel.

Bernard’s reassignment was done in 2019 when the Caribbean Maritime University (CMU) scandal involving then Education Minister Ruel Reid started to unfold, but he was never told why he was being transferred.

The public official was informed by way of letter from the Office of the Services Commission dated March 1, 2019, that his reassignment was being done on the recommendation of Prime Minister Andrew Holness and in keeping with Section 126(3) of the Constitution of Jamaica.

The reassignment was to take effect from February 14, 2019, but the salary and allowances would remain unchanged.

But Bernard responded with a claim against the Services Commission and the attorney general, seeking leave for a judicial review as well as a stay of execution of the reassignment, a declaration of the move as unconstitutional and null, and a mandate to reverse the directive.

Among Bernard’s grounds for the claim were that the prime minister had no authority to recommend reassignment and that the commission had a duty to review the prime minister’s recommendation and that neither the Constitution nor the Staff Orders contemplated the forcible removal of a PS to a lower or other position in the public service.

The aggrieved public servant also contended that the director general is not a position on the establishment of the finance ministry and that the reassignment was done without reason and amounted to a demotion.

Attorney-at-law Marc Williams is representing Bernard, while Keith Bishop and Andrew Graham are lawyers for the Office of the Services Commission.

tanesha.mundle@gleanerjm.com