Goldman Sachs accused of fraud
The United States government has accused Goldman Sachs & Company of defrauding investors by failing to disclose conflicts of interest in mortgage investments it sold as the housing market was collapsing.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said in a civil complaint Friday that Goldman failed to reveal that one of its clients helped create - and then bet against - subprime mortgage securities that Goldman sold to other investors.
The SEC said the fraud, a blow to the reputation of Wall Street's most powerful firm, was orchestrated in 2007 by a Goldman vice-president then in his late 20s.
The employee, Fabrice Tourre, has since been promoted to executive director of Goldman Sachs International in London.
Tourre, the SEC said, boasted to a friend that he was able to put such deals together as the mortgage market was unraveling in early 2007.
In an email to the friend, he described himself as "the fabulous Fab standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!"
A call to a lawyer for Tourre, Pamela Chepiga at Allen & Overy LLP, was not returned.
Two European banks that bought the securities lost nearly US$1 billion, the SEC said. The agency is seeking to recoup profits reaped on the deal
Goldman Sachs denied the allegations. In a statement, it called the SEC's charges "completely unfounded in law and fact" and said it would contest them.
Goldman, founded more than 140 years ago, built a reputation as a trusted adviser to investment banking clients and for sending top executives into presidential Cabinet posts.
In recent years, it shifted towards taking more risks with its clients' money and its own. Goldman's trading allowed the firm to weather the financial crisis better than most other big banks. It earned a record US$4.79 billion in the last quarter of 2009.
Financial analysts said the charges dealt a setback to the firm's standing.
"It undermines their brand," said Simon Johnson, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Goldman critic. "It undermines their political clout. I don't think anybody really values being connected to Goldman at this point."
He continued: "There are many people who - until this morning - thought Goldman Sachs was well-run."
The civil lawsuit filed by the SEC in federal court in Manhattan was the government's most significant legal action related to the mortgage meltdown that ignited the financial crisis and helped plunge the country into recession.
The SEC's enforcement chief said the agency is investigating a wide range of practices related to the crisis. The prospect of possible legal jeopardy for other major financial players roiled the stock market.
The Goldman case is unusual because most SEC investigations result in a consent decree in which the investment bank neither admits or denies charges, said John Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University, said.
"The SEC has changed its style," he said. "They wanted to tell the world what they thought Goldman had done wrong."
Goldman Sachs shares fell more than 12 per cent. The Dow Jones industrial average finished down more than 125 points.
The charges come as lawmakers seek to crack down on Wall Street practices that helped cause the financial crisis. Among proposals Congress is weighing are tougher rules for complex investments like those involved in the alleged Goldman fraud.
President Barack Obama vowed Friday to veto a financial overhaul bill that does not regulate mortgage-backed securities and other so-called derivatives. Legislation in Congress would for the first time regulate derivatives, whose value depends on an underlying asset, such as mortgages or stocks. Senate Republicans oppose the bill.
The Goldman client implicated in the fraud is one of the world's largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co, run by the billionaire John Paulson. Paulson has not been charged.
The SEC said Paulson paid Goldman roughly US$15 million in 2007 to devise an investment tied to mortgage-related securities that the hedge fund viewed as likely to decline in value.
Separately, Paulson & Company took out a form of insurance that allowed it to make a huge profit when those securities became nearly worthless.
ABN Amro, a major Dutch bank, was the biggest loser in the securities, having paid Goldman US$841 million, according to the SEC. And IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, a German commercial bank, lost nearly all its US$150 million investment, the agency said. Most of the money they lost went to Paulson in a series of transactions between Goldman and the hedge fund, the SEC said.
The SEC is seeking unspecified fines and restitution from Goldman Sachs and Tourre.
Asked why the SEC did not also pursue a case against Paulson, Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said: "It was Goldman that made the representations to investors. Paulson did not."
Paulson & Company is run by John Paulson, who reaped billions by betting against subprime mortgage securities. He is not related to former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
John Paulson was among the first on Wall Street to bet heavily against subprime mortgages.
His firm earned more than US$15 billion in 2007, and he pocketed US$3.7 billion. He has since earned billions more, largely by betting against bank stocks and then buying them back after their shares plunged.
In a statement, Paulson & Co. said: "As the SEC said at its press conference, Paulson is not the subject of this complaint, made no misrepresentations and is not the subject of any charges."
Goldman told investors that a third party, ACA Management LLC, had selected the pools of subprime mortgages it used to create what are known as synthetic collateralised debt obligations.
But, the SEC alleges, Goldman misled investors by failing to disclose that Paulson & Company also played a role in selecting the mortgage pools and stood to profit from their decline in value.
"Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party," Khuzami said in a statement.
But Goldman said in a statement that it never mischaracterised Paulson's strategy in the trans-action. It added that it was not obliged to "disclose the identities of a buyer to a seller, and vice versa".
IKB was an early casualty of the financial crisis. It issued a profit warning in 2007 saying it had been hurt by US subprime mortgage investments. IKB was sold in 2008 to Dallas-based Lone Star Funds.
Ed Trissel, a spokesman for Lone Star Funds, declined to comment on the case.
Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is "pleased that the SEC is departing from the lax enforcement of the Bush administration and is returning to the SEC's proper role of protecting investors in the marketplace," spokesman Steven Adamske said.
The SEC charges come after Goldman Sachs denied last week it bet against clients by selling them mortgage-backed securities while reducing its own exposure to them.
In an annual letter to share-holders, Goldman said it began reducing its exposure to the US mortgage market in late 2006.