Kudos Chief Justice Sykes

THE EDITOR, Madam:

The recent public exchange between Justice Bryan Sykes and Minister Delroy Chuck offers a timely reminder of why judicial independence remains the bedrock of our democracy.

At the heart of the discussion is the Child Diversion Act, legislation designed to steer vulnerable children away from the formal criminal justice system and toward rehabilitation. As the chief justice rightly pointed out, judges are guided by the text enacted by Parliament, not by ministerial explanations or evolving policy preferences. The law, as written, represents the collective will of the legislature. If that wording produces unintended consequences, the remedy lies not in public criticism of judges but in legislative amendment.

Chief Justice Sykes’ comments were measured, principled, and entirely consistent with his oath of office. He reaffirmed Parliament’s authority. By emphasising that ministerial statements are not law, he underscored a fundamental truth: our constitutional order depends on each branch of government respecting its boundaries. For a minister, however well-meaning, to suggest that judges are misinterpreting legislation because they do not share his understanding risks creating the impression that judicial decisions should bend to executive preference.

Chief Justice Sykes has demonstrated steady and thoughtful leadership of the judiciary. Under his stewardship, there have been ongoing efforts to modernise court operations, improve case management, and increase transparency in the administration of justice. He has consistently promoted professionalism and accountability while defending the independence that allows judges to decide cases without fear or favour. These are not glamorous achievements, but they are vital to public confidence in the justice system.

His willingness to engage journalists in open conversation further reflects a commitment to demystifying the courts and fostering public understanding. At a time when institutions around the world face scepticism, such openness strengthens trust rather than weakens it. In defending the principle that judges interpret the law as written, Chief Justice Sykes defended not himself but the Constitution. He reminded us that, if clarity is lacking, Parliament has both the right and the responsibility to amend its statutes.

For his clarity, courage, and continued dedication to justice, Chief Justice Bryan Sykes deserves commendation. Jamaica is well served by a jurist who understands that fidelity to the law, not deference to power, is the true measure of judicial service.

ROBERT DALLEY

robertdalley99@proton.me