Mon | Oct 23, 2017

Removal of mandatory fees would be a retrograde step - JTA president

Published:Wednesday | November 18, 2015 | 12:00 AM
Allen

The plans of the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) to remove mandatory fees in schools should it form the next government have not been met with favour from Jamaica Teachers' Association (JTA) President Norman Allen.

Mandatory fees include auxiliary fees and form part of the cost-sharing mechanism that is currently used to fund schools.

Given the financial constraints currently facing the Government, Allen has signalled that he is not confident that any government will be able to fully fund schools from its coffers, and as such, mandatory fees, in particular auxiliary fees, should continue to serve as a means of supplementing funds that schools receive from the Ministry of Education.

"In the high schools, the auxiliary fees are there to make sure that the programmes they have cater to the needs of the children. The auxiliary fees are significant to offset some of the other expenditures that schools have to treat with, so the programmes that they put in place, they have festival, they have sports, all of those activities you have to identify the funds to treat with it, and these auxiliary fees are what they use to facilitate the introduction of programmes like those and to help to support those programmes and allow schools to give the children a rounded education," he said.

Allen said he would not support a move that will change the current cost-sharing arrangements in regard to auxiliary fees.

"As JTA president, I recognise that our schools are under-funded and, therefore, the removal of any source of funding from the schools would be a retrograde step. I could never support the removal of auxiliary fees ... it would be a retrograde step to go and remove financial support programmes that are already in the schools," he said.

Newly elected president of the Jamaica Association of Principals of Primary Schools, David Wilson, has also raised doubts about the ability of any government to find the funds to offset the removal of auxiliary and mandatory fees.

 

Auxiliary fees needed

 

Wilson, who is also principal of Clarendon College, told The Gleaner that he operates on a budget of $40 million, half of which is supplied by the Government. According to him, the most feasible option of finding the additional funds that are needed is to ask parents to make a contribution through auxiliary fees.

"Parents are well aware that if their children's education is going to be the best that they want it to be, it has to be paid for, and I think, in all fairness, they are willing, and those who can afford, they do make the contribution," he said.

Wilson outlined some implications of the removal of auxiliary fees.

"In terms of what you offer, as a school, you are not going to be able to offer that anymore. In terms of your laboratory facilities... in terms of computer labs ... it costs to effectively offer the best product to the students and you have to have the resources to manage that, and removing the contribution that they would make would mean that the Government would have to find the resources, and I think it is a challenge for any government today to offer a programme that says nobody will contribute," he said.

Paul Adams, principal of Herbert Morrison High and former president of the JTA, pointed out that auxiliary fees represent the balance of a school's operating cost that the Government cannot afford to pay.

andre.poyser@gleanerjm.com