No baby boom!

Published: Thursday | October 18, 2012 Comments 0

Gary Spaulding, Senior Gleaner Writer

There has been no baby boom in Jamaica over the past 10 years.

In fact, the reality is quite the opposite. Not surprisingly, the decline in births has triggered a marginal increase in Jamaica's population between 2001, when the penultimate census was taken, and 2011.

The figures would suggest that years of urging by the authorities that spawned the maxim 'two is better than too many', among other birth control public-education messages, has sunk into the psyche of young Jamaicans - at least in some quarters of society.

The Statistical Institute of Jamaica (STATIN) revealed yesterday in its census findings that fewer than 500,000 babies were added to the Jamaica population over the past decade, falling from an average of 24.2 per 1,000 between 1991 and 2001 to 17.4 per 1,000 between 2001 and 2011.

In its own words, STATIN attributed the low growth rates to "declining numbers of births".

The figures are contained in the 2011 Population and Housing Census, launched yesterday, which revealed that the population is still less than 2.7 million.

In fact, the precise population figure is 2.678 million, an obvious surprise to some, but not to STATIN officials who had been monitoring the data.

Some Jamaicans had expressed belief that it was higher. This represents a mere 3.5 per cent increase in the nearly 10 years since the 2001 census, which indicated a population of 2.607 million. The 2011 population figure represents an annual growth rate of 0.36 per cent since 2001.

STATIN's director of censuses, demographic and social statistic, Dr Valerie Nam, attributed the slow growth rate to a significant downward trajectory of the birth rate.

This was reflected in the census data which indicated that population changes must be interpreted within the context of the three components of population change - births, deaths and migration.





MIGRANTS HARD TO NUMBER

Nam noted that the figures on births and deaths were not hard to come by - not so for those on migration.

Between 2001 and 2011, 438,318 babies were added to the local population which lost nearly 347,967 persons to death or migration.

The figures also reflect a marginal increase in the death rate, from 6.4 per 1,000 in 1991 to 7.1 in 2001.

STATIN found that the difference in the population from natural increase (difference between births and deaths) was 259,065 over the decade.

"The very low growth rate of 0.356 per cent was only the second time since census taking began in Jamaica in the late 19th century that the rates have been so low," the report stated. "The previous period was between 1911 and 1921 and the low rate at that time attributable to the high levels of migration."

gary.spaulding@gleanerjm.com

Population growth slows due to low rate of births

Change in parish population over 10 years\

 Parish 2001 2011
 Kingston 96,052 89,057
 St Andrew 555,828 573,369
 St Thomas 91,604 93,902
 Portland 80,205 81,744
 St Mary 111,466 113,615
 St Ann 166,762 172,362
 Trelawny 73,066 75,164
 St James 175,127 183,811
 Hanover 67,037 69,533
 Westmoreland 138,948 144,103
 St Elizabeth 146,404 150,205
 Manchester 185,801 189,797
 Clarendon 237,024 245,103
 St Catherine 482,308 516,218

Babies Born

 Census year Number
 1911 370,200
1943 765,300
 1960 855,500
 1970 676,500
 1982 747,788
 1991 505,844
 2001 603,090
 2011 438,318

How we have grown since 1911

 Census year Population
 1911 831,383
 1921 858,118
 1943 1,237,063
 1960 1,609,814
 1970 1,848,512
 1982 2,190,357
 1991 2,380,666
 2001 2,607,632
 2011 2,697,983

Share |

The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner.
The Gleaner reserves the right not to publish comments that may be deemed libelous, derogatory or indecent. Please keep comments short and precise. A maximum of 8 sentences should be the target. Longer responses/comments should be sent to "Letters of the Editor" using the feedback form provided.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Top Jobs

View all Jobs

Videos