Address leadership deficiencies in schools

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I am writing to address a troubling pattern of prioritisation of titles over effective leadership in the schools. The Peter Principle, which suggests that individuals are promoted until they reach a level of incompetence is manifesting within our schools, compounded by political affiliations and tenure-based promotions.

Recent events highlight the consequences at St James High School in Montego Bay, a longstanding acrimonious relationship between Principal Joseph Williams and Board Chairman Christopher McCurdy escalated on February 24 leading to the suspension of classes. The Gleaner on February 25 reported that the two engaged in a verbal altercation during a staff meeting, which continued into the school’s parking lot, disrupting school operations.

Similarly, at Jamaica College, last year April 4, the alumni protested against Board Chairman Lance Hylton, citing concerns over financial transparency and management. At Central High School in Clarendon, staff demonstrated against their board chairman due to perceived mismanagement in February and March 2019.

These incidents show a systemic issue where leadership positions are granted not on merit but on years of service or political allegiance.

The effects are dire – declining accountability, ineffective decision-making, and erosion of trust in school governance. Leadership should not be a reward for longevity or political loyalty but a responsibility given to those with the competence, vision, and integrity to uplift educational institutions.

To address this, policymakers should to establish transparent, merit-based selection processes for school leadership. Further, ongoing professional development must be mandated to ensure that our institutions are led by individuals equipped with the necessary skills to drive positive change.

If we care about the future of our children and the integrity of our education system, we must demand action over titles.

CONROY BONNICK