Call for thoughtful public discourse on school bus system

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I write with concern after reading the article published on Sunday, July 13, titled “Not Certified – Elhydro Got $1.4b School Bus Contract Without Dealer Status.” I believe this matter calls for thoughtful public discourse, not mere sensationalism or political finger-pointing.

While the article raises eyebrows about the awarding of the school bus contract to Elhydro, a company reportedly without local dealer certification, it is important that we approach the issue with balance and a firm focus on outcomes that will benefit the children. The concern must be whether the process, perhaps unconventional, still aligns with the Government’s broader vision to strengthen and modernise student transportation. Before we rush to condemn, we must ask ourselves: are we allowing politics to cloud our judgement on an initiative that could drastically improve the lives of thousands of school children?

We live in a time where incidents of child abductions and other criminal threats are growing concerns for every parent. If we have an opportunity to transport children in safer, more structured, and supervised ways, shouldn’t we be supporting it? Are we prioritising the best interest of students, or are we allowing political undertones to overshadow much-needed progress?

Let us not pretend that procurement challenges are new, but at the same time, transparency and accountability in public procurement remain pillars of good governance. While it may be legally permissible to award contracts based on unsolicited proposals, such as in Elhydro’s case, the lack of due diligence regarding dealership certification and competitive tendering may leave the door open for public distrust. It is in the Government’s best interest to clarify these gaps not just to defend a decision but to reaffirm its commitment to efficiency, equity, and integrity in the use of public funds.

The article rightly invites questions, but it must not derail what could be a transformative project. We must resist politicising this matter and instead encourage a constructive review process. Picture a single mother working two jobs just to provide basic necessities. Every day, she struggles to scrape together enough bus fare to send her children to school, often having to make hard choices between lunch money and transportation. With a national school bus system in place, this mother can breathe easier knowing her children will arrive at school on time and most importantly, safely.

Let us not only to hold decision-makers accountable but also to improve and expand initiatives that safeguard youth. The transportation programme, if executed with the right standards and oversight, can become a legacy of this administration, one that puts children first and builds public trust in our systems.

CIVANNA COTTERELL